Yale Bulletin and Calendar

November 3, 2000Volume 29, Number 9



BULLETIN HOME

VISITING ON CAMPUS

CALENDAR OF EVENTS

BULLETIN BOARD

CLASSIFIED ADS


SEARCH ARCHIVES

PRODUCTION SCHEDULE

BULLETIN STAFF


PUBLIC AFFAIRS HOME

NEWS RELEASES

E-MAIL US


YALE HOME PAGE


Yale team's software results in more accurate polling

It is hard to figure out what all those polls really show about who will likely win the Nov. 7 presidential election, but help is now available.

Political science professors Donald Green and Alan Gerber, with statistics graduate student Jay Emerson, have developed new software that filters out stray "noise" caused by sampling errors, and posted it for free on the Internet.

Called Samplemiser (www.samplemiser.com), this software separates real change in opinion from meaningless fluctuation. It automatically weights new information against older surveys, dramatically boosting the accuracy of the results.

Samplemiser bases its calculations on a longer time period than most polls, which use only the most recent three days of data. By including information that goes back for a longer period, Samplemiser smoothes out the peaks and valleys that look significant, but are really meaningless. It also saves pollsters money by increasing the useful life of the data they collect and reducing the number of interviews needed for an accurate survey.

Furthermore, data from any poll can be inserted, allowing the Samplemiser user to get a more accurate reading of the CNN/USA Today/Gallup polls, or surveys done by Newsweek, ABC News, the New York Times/CBS News and others.

Green used Samplemiser to clarify the significance of changes in the candidates' relative popularity as reported in recent polls and found "it's usually nine parts noise to one part change."

Samplemiser uses a method called "Kalman filtering," well known in electrical engineering since the 1960s, but never before used in the analysis of survey data, according to Green.

"In 10 or 15 years, everybody will be using this technique or another one like it. We'll look back and wonder about how polls were interpreted without it," Green says. When using the software, "This algorithm comes up with an optimal way of weighting the present and the past. When you do that, you greatly reduce your uncertainty about where opinion stands right now," he explains.

Green, Gerber and Suzanna De Boef, assistant professor of political science at Pennsylvania State University, originally proposed this method for reducing sampling error in a scholarly article, "Tracking Opinion Over Time," published in the Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 63, in 1999.

-- By Gila Reinstein


T H I SW E E K ' SS T O R I E S

Yale announces $250 milion plan for arts buildings

Streep, other alumni stars to shine for Yale

University gets Seal of the City

Yale astronomers spot new planet

Grant will fund database for brain research

Green Hall is dedicated as 'versatile' home to School of Art


ENDOWED PROFESSORSHIPS

Haskins Lab to study how speakers and listeners interact

Research reveals patients don't understand risks of angioplasty

Study: Virtual reality headsets ease patients' discomfort

Yale team's software results in more accurate polling

Actor extols Yale experience and the power of words

Heaney recalls when 'poetry came like a grace into my life'

Veteran actor Ernest Borgnine reminisces about his career

Philosopher to discuss impact of globalization

'Unite for Sight': Undergraduates focus on educating others about eye care

English Department to host annual staged play reading

Concert to benefit Dwight Hall

Tribute to celebrate Copland's life and work

Conference to focus on 'Staging Brazilian and Portuguese Theater'

Legal scholars to honor former Law School dean

Women artists to discuss their works

Campus Notes

In the News

Yale Scoreboard



Bulletin Home|Visiting on Campus| Calendar of Events|Bulletin Board

Classified Ads|Search Archives|Production Schedule|Bulletin Staff

Public Affairs Home|News Releases| E-Mail Us|Yale Home Page