Yale Bulletin and Calendar

November 21, 2003|Volume 32, Number 12|Two-Week Issue



BULLETIN HOME

VISITING ON CAMPUS

CALENDAR OF EVENTS

IN THE NEWS

BULLETIN BOARD

CLASSIFIED ADS


SEARCH ARCHIVES

DEADLINES

DOWNLOAD FORMS

BULLETIN STAFF


PUBLIC AFFAIRS HOME

NEWS RELEASES

E-MAIL US


YALE HOME PAGE


Voters are more influenced by political parties than by personal beliefs, says study

People vote on an issue based on the facts and their ideology, or personal beliefs, but they disregard both the facts and their personal beliefs when they are aware of their political party's position, according to a Yale study.

Moreover, people are not aware that they are influenced by their party's position and believe that their stance stems from an objective assessment of the policy's merits.

"This research suggests that people base consequential attitudes about important social problems largely upon the attitude of party leaders and peers," says Geoffrey Cohen, assistant professor of psychology and author of the study published in the November issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. "And they do so while remaining convinced that they have formed their beliefs autonomously and objectively."

One of Cohen's studies included 48 individuals earlier identified as liberals and 31 identified as conservatives. They voted on two hypothetical welfare policies -- one very generous and the other very stringent.

When they did not know the position of their party, people voted consistent with their personal ideology and the objective content of the policy. Liberals preferred the generous policy, conservatives the stringent one. However, when informed of their political party's position on the issue, they disregarded the content of the policy and assumed the party's position. They even backed up their position by writing editorials that they thought would be reviewed by real policy makers at a political institute. In addition, individuals thought that votes contrary to their own were based on partisanship and political biases.

"To the extent that people remain blind to group influence on themselves, they may feel that they alone have based their beliefs on a rational assessment of the facts, while their adversaries, and even their allies, are biased," Cohen says.

He now is examining intervention strategies to encourage a more rational, even-handed examination of information relevant to political issues.

-- By Jacqueline Weaver


T H I SW E E K ' SS T O R I E S

Yale delegates work to forge new collaborations in China

Applications are up in University's first 'early action' year

Voters are more influenced by political parties . . .

Dwight Hall launches fundraising campaign

ENDOWED PROFESSORSHIPS

Women astronauts tell how they realized dream of space travel

Event celebrates contributions of women scientists

Pfizer establishes fellowship in neuroscience to honor Goldman-Rakic

Faculty forum addresses issues affecting women in science, medicine

YaleGlobal marks one-year anniversary

Reporter to discuss 'shock and awe' of covering White House

Grant supports initiative to send doctors overseas

Scientists win funding to collect data on the rice genome

Grant supports team's creation of robot to help diagnose autism

Yale selected as nation's first site for cancer epidemiology training . . .

Campus Notes


Bulletin Home|Visiting on Campus|Calendar of Events|In the News

Bulletin Board|Classified Ads|Search Archives|Deadlines

Bulletin Staff|Public Affairs|News Releases| E-Mail Us|Yale Home