Yale Bulletin and Calendar

April 23, 2004|Volume 32, Number 27



BULLETIN HOME

VISITING ON CAMPUS

CALENDAR OF EVENTS

IN THE NEWS

BULLETIN BOARD

CLASSIFIED ADS


SEARCH ARCHIVES

DEADLINES

DOWNLOAD FORMS

BULLETIN STAFF


PUBLIC AFFAIRS HOME

NEWS RELEASES

E-MAIL US


YALE HOME PAGE


Study shows how brain unconsciously processes images

Yale researchers have found that the brain can unconsciously differentiate between social stimuli (pictures of faces) and non-social stimuli (pictures of objects) using a primitive visual pathway that terminates in the amygdala.

"These results provide the best evidence to date that this pathway can process unseen images that have social relevance," says senior author Robert T. Schultz, associate professor in the Yale Child Study Center.

To measure how the brain responds to images of great social importance that are not consciously seen, Schultz and his co-authors presented pictures of houses to a group of healthy young adults ages 18 to 34, during functional MRI measurement of brain activity. The pictures were simultaneously superimposed with pictures of emotionally expressive faces or a neutral non-social object such as a chair. Because the participants wore 3-D glasses with colored lenses, pictures of the faces were randomly projected to just one eye.

While the brain's cortex mirrored the participants' experience and just saw the houses, a phylogenetically older pathway involving the amygdala registered the unconscious representation of the human face.

"This shows that the brain's response to pictures of faces were not consciously seen and that older visual structures of the brain can differentiate social from non-social stimuli without input from the cortex," says Schultz.

The study proves that the amygdala and related sub-cortical visual structures can differentiate social from non-social stimuli without cortical input, says Schultz. The approach can also now be used as a model to understand infant perception, as this is heavily reliant on the sub-cortical visual system during the first weeks and perhaps months of life, while the cortical system is still maturing and coming on line, he notes.

These study methods are now being adapted to research various disorders, such as autism, where there is a known role for the amygdala in the pathophysiology, but where the relative importance of sub-cortical vs. cortical inputs have not until now been able to be disentangled for lack of an appropriate method.

Other authors on the study included Brian N. Pasley and Linda C. Mayes at the School of Medicine.

-- By Karen Peart


T H I SW E E K ' SS T O R I E S

Study shows how brain unconsciously processes images

Freshman cartoonist illustrates Washington Post column

Al Gore decries 'collision' between civilization and the environment

Carlos Fuentes calls for changes to close gap . . .

Panel: Respect is key to proper treatment of those with disabilities

Making Web pages accessible to all

Horwich honored for work on protein folding

'There's right on both sides' of civil liberties debate, journalist says

Play by Drama School graduate to close Yale Rep season

Americans, Europeans to debate right to intervene in Iraq

Study: Early instruction can change the brains of reading-disabled youths

U.S. poet laureate to give reading of her new work

Columnist to discuss why press failed on 9/11 and Iraq

New research on human conflict is focus of international conference

A Day of Community, a Day of Culture

Engineer Csaba Horváth, a pioneer in chromatography, dies

Mary Louise Brewster, widow of former Yale president, dies

Service, symposium to honor scientist Robert Macnab

Conference to explore work in the field of American Indian studies

Symposium will re-examine seminal essay by . . . Robert Cover

ITS support specialist to perform in 'Hamlet'


Bulletin Home|Visiting on Campus|Calendar of Events|In the News

Bulletin Board|Classified Ads|Search Archives|Deadlines

Bulletin Staff|Public Affairs|News Releases| E-Mail Us|Yale Home