Yale Bulletin and Calendar

October 10, 2003|Volume 32, Number 6



BULLETIN HOME

VISITING ON CAMPUS

CALENDAR OF EVENTS

IN THE NEWS

BULLETIN BOARD

CLASSIFIED ADS


SEARCH ARCHIVES

DEADLINES

DOWNLOAD FORMS

BULLETIN STAFF


PUBLIC AFFAIRS HOME

NEWS RELEASES

E-MAIL US


YALE HOME PAGE


Study shows even obesity
experts have anti-fat bias

Obesity specialists -- from physicians and researchers to pharmacologists and psychologists -- showed significant anti-fat bias according to a recent Yale study.

"The stigma of obesity is so strong that even those most knowledgeable about the condition infer that obese people have blameworthy behavioral characteristics that contribute to their problem, e.g. being lazy," says Marlene Schwartz, associate research scientist in the Department of Psychology and lead researcher of the study published in the September issue of the journal Obesity Research. "Furthermore, these biases extend to core characteristics of intelligence and personal worth.

"On both implicit and explicit measures, health professionals associated the stereotypes lazy, stupid and worthless with obese people," she says. There also was a significant relationship between age and bias; younger people show greater bias.

She says the findings were particularly noteworthy since the sample was comprised of professionals who treat and study obesity, a group that understands that obesity results from genetic and environmental factors and is not simply a function of individual behavior.

The study extended earlier research by identifying predictors of bias level. Health professionals who work directly with obese patients showed less bias than those who did not. In addition, feelings of understanding the experience of obesity and having obese friends were associated with lower levels of bias.

The study included health professionals attending the opening session of an international obesity conference in Quebec City. Three hundred eighty-nine clinicians and researchers were given the Implicit Associations Test (IAT) and a self-report questionnaire assessing explicit attitudes, personal experiences with obesity and demographic characteristics.

The IAT is a timed measure of automatic associations. It was used in this study to assess overall implicit weight bias, associating "obese people" with "bad" and "thin people" with "good," as well as three ranges of stereotypes: lazy-motivated, smart-stupid, and valuable-worthless. The questionnaire assessed explicit bias on the same criteria, along with personal and professional experiences with obesity.

Co-authors included Kelly Brownell of Yale, as well as Heather Chambliss and Steven Blair of the Cooper Institute in Dallas, and Charles Billington of the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The study was funded by the Rudd Institute.

-- By Jacqueline Weaver


T H I SW E E K ' SS T O R I E S

Historian Winroth wins MacArthur Fellowship

YB&C launches new online Calendar

Exhibits, symposium explore culture of colonial India

Study shows even obesity experts have anti-fat bias

Annual festival celebrates local artists' creativity

Play based on a real-life murder is Yale Rep's first offering

Gallery appoints its first curator of African art

A welcome 'Jeopardy!'

Researchers examine asthma-related health issues

Events explore the 'values and perspectives' of South Asia

SOM survey shows consumer confidence in stock market . . .

School to host third 'Yale M.B.A. Women's Summit'

Exhibit of coins and medals traces history of imperial Russia

YCIAS expands its support of career and alumni services

Museum expands its Student Guide Program

Yale's California Campus

Memorial Service For Patricia Goldman-Rakic

Employees can change benefit options . . .

Yale Books in Brief

Campus Notes


Bulletin Home|Visiting on Campus|Calendar of Events|In the News

Bulletin Board|Classified Ads|Search Archives|Deadlines

Bulletin Staff|Public Affairs|News Releases| E-Mail Us|Yale Home