Yale Bulletin and Calendar

July 15, 2005|Volume 33, Number 31|Six-Week Issue


BULLETIN HOME

VISITING ON CAMPUS

CALENDAR OF EVENTS

IN THE NEWS

BULLETIN BOARD

CLASSIFIED ADS


SEARCH ARCHIVES

DEADLINES

DOWNLOAD FORMS

BULLETIN STAFF


PUBLIC AFFAIRS HOME

NEWS RELEASES

E-MAIL US


YALE HOME PAGE


Study shows how sex discrimination
in job hiring is able to endure

Shifting their hiring criteria after learning the gender of job applicants is one way that employers engage in sex discrimination despite laws and policies banning it, according to a study by Yale researchers published in June.

"The question we wanted to answer is how, in this system of meritocracy where people are supposed to be judged on the basis of their personal credentials and accomplishments, the reality of discrimination continues," says Geoffrey Cohen, associate professor in the Department of Psychology and co-author of the study with doctoral student Eric Uhlmann.

What the researchers found in three studies was that people making hiring decisions construct criteria of merit congenial to the particular strengths of members of the advantaged or dominant group. Those participants who felt most strongly that they had been objective actually proved the most biased, Cohen adds.

In one study, participants were asked to hire a new police chief, for which there were male and female applicants. Some of the applicants had more on-the-job "street" experience, while others had stronger educational backgrounds.

"When people were evaluating male applicants they shifted the job criteria to emphasize the importance of whatever credentials the male applicants happened to have," Cohen says. They showed no such favoritism when evaluating female applicants, and even tended to denigrate the importance of the female applicants' areas of strength, he says.

In a second study, participants were asked to hire a women's studies professor. In this case they based their hiring criteria on whatever the particular strengths of the female applicants happened to be. The third study revealed that gender discrimination was eliminated through the simple intervention of having people commit to hiring criteria before they reviewed an applicant's credentials.

"People who make hiring decisions should decide what criteria are important to a particular job before the interviews so that there is no room to maneuver later on," Cohen says. "That kind of pre-commitment may help to reduce discrimination."

-- By Jacqueline Weaver


T H I SW E E K ' SS T O R I E S

Yale launches program to train urban teachers

New alumni fellow elected

Sensors won't save lives from suicide bombers, warns Yale expert

Study: Monkeys ape humans' economic traits

Richard Shaw departs for Stanford post

Tennis goes co-ed at this year's Pilot Pen

Yale co-sponsors 'City of Summer' concerts and films

Exhibit features post-Civil War works by 'artful storyteller'

Yale alumni, teachers win Tony Awards

ENDOWED PROFESSORSHIPS

Law School project exploring the information society . . .

Poll shows public's distaste with foreign oil dependence

Scientists discover how plants protect themselves from infection

Team seeking 'perfume' to control malaria-carrying mosquitoes

Geologists use ancient sea algae to trace CO2 levels of long ago

Study shows how sex discrimination in job hiring is able to endure

YSN study shows effectiveness of preschool health screenings

SCHOOL OF MEDICINE NEWS

Spotlight on Sports

Athletics archive now in library's collection

Three promoted to post of associate provost

Event to explore role of faith in the corporate world

In Memoriam: Dick Wittink, marketing expert and SOM teacher

Five faculty members awarded Guggenheim Fellowships for research

Event explored how libraries can benefit city schools

New alumni lauded for efforts to improve public schools

Yale Books in Brief

Campus Notes


Bulletin Home|Visiting on Campus|Calendar of Events|In the News

Bulletin Board|Classified Ads|Search Archives|Deadlines

Bulletin Staff|Public Affairs|News Releases| E-Mail Us|Yale Home